| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Drachen Protectorate
Aerie Logistics and Construction
Corus Conglomerate
0
   |
Posted - 2014.07.30 13:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Thanks forums for killing my responses. |
Drachen Protectorate
Aerie Logistics and Construction
Corus Conglomerate
0
|
Posted - 2014.08.01 15:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Quote:I'm just not a fan of many alts and multiboxing, nothing can change my mind in this matter.
You're not a fan of alts or multiboxing, but you are pressing for the matter to have ISboxer banned outright. Hmm.. seems to be you're not just "not a fan" but outright hate the thing with a vengeance.
Quote:And no I won't try something I don't want others to use. :) Though I've seen plenty videos on it, have read some stuff and met couple isboxing fleets. And alts are not new thing today, but when I was playing back than only few people had them. Than it spread and I've noticed the changes.
If you won't try it out yourself, it means you're talking out of your ass. Talking about stuff you've only seen or heard about and at that, you've only seen people who successfully do stuff. You don't see videos of people who failed miserably at using it, just like there aren't many PvP videos of people losing battles. Same will killboards. There's a ton of kills missing so certain corporations killboards would look positive.
Quote:And btw, if ISBoxer would be so bad to use and you would lose your fleet sending it wrong way why would people use it? Because it doesn't happen as often I guess as huge isk income or very unfair PvP. But I guess today PvP is Player vs Program.
ISBoxer looks simple, but it's not. You need to take a good lot of time to set everything up. That's the basic thing that is also pointed out in the readme. Set it up first. It's not like Windows Explorer, install and it works. Hell no. You need to set it up. Try it. Tweak it for different toons, etc etc. And like I told you in the quotation above, nobody shows the videos of how they failed with ISboxer. Nor are people willing to admit they spent 3 real time days to set EVERYTHING up properly, so it's just net profit from now on. |
Drachen Protectorate
Valkyrie Logistics and Construction
Corus Conglomerate
2
|
Posted - 2014.08.04 07:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
Exactly.
But there's people complaining what all ruins the game in THEIR perspective, as everyone "should be on equal footing".
If you want everyone on equal footing, go complain how the t2 bpo's are no longer obtainable and how people who have them are making a fortune with little to no effort. |
Drachen Protectorate
Valkyrie Logistics and Construction
Corus Conglomerate
3
|
Posted - 2014.08.08 13:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
You're welcome to try having 255 accounts synched in a perfect order and bomb a fleet with bombs. No really, if you can get all your 254 remaining accounts up to Bomber T2 status, I'll even put my entire 8man mining team on the grind for you to bomb.
Let me know when you have the hardware and setups to even try this thing.
Until then, stop making ridonculous comments with irrelevant numbers that nobody uses. If everything is "so easy" as you portray in your fanatically ridonculous posts, why aren't there alliances wiping current low/null residents/renters off the map with the easy mode ISBoxer usage?
Maybe, just maybe you'll sometime in some form realize, that ISboxer fills a certain niche of gamplay, but doesn't in fact replace real people behind the computer.
But hey, if you can't handle multiple accounts, I'd say you should look at the following two COMMON problems.
PEBKAC
ID 10 T |
Drachen Protectorate
Valkyrie Logistics and Construction
Corus Conglomerate
10
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 11:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Prostetnik Vogon Jeltz wrote:Q) Why ban multiboxing software? A) Because, as far as I am concerned it is violation of the EULA which as players we are supposed to abide by. --> A) Because, however you see it, it is having an effect on the in game economy which affects everyone. Q) Why has CCP not banned it? -> A) Because they are making money from it, albeit indirectly.
<- The point of EVE Online is for it to make revenue. If it didn't, it would be a waste of running their servers on.
<-- Yea, the prices are lower than they are supposed to be. I'm certain we all agree you should be BUYING 1 unit of Tritanium for at least 50ISK, not 5isk per unit. That's what you get with people multiboxing industry chars. The price of materials and consequentially everything built from them, drops.
When you next blow up your t1 frigate and laugh at measly 5mil isk price you lost, imagine how it would be if the price was 5x higher. |
Drachen Protectorate
Valkyrie Logistics and Construction
Corus Conglomerate
10
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 09:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
Pakokkie wrote:Well, now I don't understand ccp anymore.
People that died to a character using isbox have their ships reimbursed.
So what is ccp's position on this?
CCP will never issue that, so you might as well forget it. Just stop ganking miners. |
Drachen Protectorate
Valkyrie Logistics and Construction
Corus Conglomerate
10
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 08:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
Lilly Naari wrote:The real issue here is not people useing 5-10 accounts, it's guys like Memory-Alpha who have 300+ and actively use 50-80+ at a time to both PvP and Strip every belt in a system in less then 2 hours. And an icebelt in less then 10 minuets.
My alt warped into an icebelt earlier today to mine some ice, and He was sitting there with an orca 2 freighters and 40+ Skiffs all bunched up in a ball.
I don;t think ISboxer should be banned persay, but this is getting ridiculous. When one person can control 50-100 toons "Simultaniously", there is a severe issue.
Besides, we all know these massive fleets are Isk Farmers selling isk and RMTing anyway.
40+ Man ISboxer fleet mains I have seen:
* Memory-Alpha - Operates out of Yoma
* Lucutus-Borg - Yoma, Elonaya, a few others
Come CSMs, put your collective intelligence together and do something, enough is enough.
So? Stop space lawyering and do something about it. He consents to PvP every time he undocks. Just imagine if those two would be doing that in a rented 0.0 space. Nobody would notice and there wouldn't be any complaints from your side. So what's the problem? |
Drachen Protectorate
Valkyrie Logistics and Construction
Corus Conglomerate
10
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 14:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lilly Naari wrote:But it's cool, as soon as they get greedy and set there eyes on Nullsec (which they will because more and more of them are apearing and eventually highsec will get too crowded), and when the nullbears start loseing space and sov to 100-200 ISBOX fleets daily and hourly, the Nullbears will demand change and lo and behold, ISboxer will get banned. (Or some restriction put in that disallows the controll of more then a reasonable amount ofaccounts at a time.).
They are welcome to come and try. The best people using ISBoxer have been able to do is run a fleet of bombers. Anything more complex and they fail miserably. Boo hoo., let's see those 100-200 ISBboxer fleets come to null and try to do stuff. In PvP that is. I'm quite certain someone who can effectively run 100 miners is far better off to rent out a system in null and earn 50x more than they do in high-sec.
But that's just me, I'd go for higher proffits if I could run 50+ accounts. I'd strip a Large Cluster in 2 hours. |
| |
|